Luma v. State , 208 So. 3d 226 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed November 23, 2016.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D16-2363
    Lower Tribunal No. 97-29656
    ________________
    Herby Luma, a/k/a Ronet Bastien,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the
    Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.
    Herby Luma, a/k/a Ronet Bastien, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, LAGOA and LOGUE, JJ.
    WELLS, Judge.
    Herby Luma appeals an order striking his motion to correct an illegal
    sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court’s
    basis for striking the motion was that it had precluded him from filing further
    pleadings without an authorized signature from a member of the Florida Bar.
    However, while the court below issued a rule to show cause why Luma should not
    be prohibited from the filing of further pro se motions attacking his convictions
    and sentences in this case, neither the scant appellate record before us nor the
    lower court docket conclusively confirm that the lower court ever entered an order
    prohibiting him from such pro se filings.
    We treat the instant appeal of the order striking Luma’s motion as an appeal
    from the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief. See Cruz v. State,
    
    981 So. 2d 1272
    , 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). On appeal from a summary denial,
    this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P.
    9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See
    Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). Because the record now before us fails to make the
    required showing, we reverse the order now before us and remand for further
    proceedings.    If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the
    postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing
    that Luma is not entitled to any relief.
    Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2363

Citation Numbers: 208 So. 3d 226

Filed Date: 11/23/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023