United States v. Randall Herbst ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 20-2851
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Randall Allen Herbst
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
    ____________
    Submitted: May 3, 2021
    Filed: May 10, 2021
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Randall Herbst is serving a term of supervised release in connection with his
    conviction for a sex offense. Included among the conditions is participation in
    polygraph testing. In the face of a claim that it may be unsafe in light of a health
    issue, the district court1 added a condition requiring him to allow his probation
    officer or a polygraph examiner to speak with his doctor. Though he challenges this
    modification, we affirm.
    We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United
    States v. Davies, 
    380 F.3d 329
    , 332 (8th Cir. 2004) (reviewing the modification of
    the conditions of supervised release for an abuse of discretion). The record shows
    that the modification was reasonably necessary to enforce his existing obligation to
    participate in polygraph testing. See 
    id.
     (discussing a district court’s “broad
    discretion” when modifying release conditions); cf. United States v. Newell, 
    915 F.3d 587
    , 590–91 (8th Cir. 2019) (affirming the imposition of a condition requiring
    polygraph testing). We also decline to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
    claim raised in Herbst’s pro se brief. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 
    449 F.3d 824
    , 826–27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually best
    litigated in collateral proceedings”).
    We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel
    permission to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the Southern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-2851

Filed Date: 5/10/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/10/2021