United States v. Richard Huff ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 21-1557
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Richard Alan Huff
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa - Western
    ____________
    Submitted: August 20, 2021
    Filed: August 25, 2021
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Richard Huff appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled
    guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver.
    1
    The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
    the Southern District of Iowa.
    His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967),
    challenging the reasonableness of the sentence, and has moved to withdraw.
    We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the
    issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 
    627 F.3d 702
    , 704 (8th Cir.
    2010) (this court reviews de novo validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United
    States v. Andis, 
    333 F.3d 886
    , 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will
    be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and
    voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not
    result in a miscarriage of justice).
    Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the
    appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss
    the appeal.
    ______________________________
    -2-