Shawn Jeffrey Sheppard v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:









  • In The

    Court of Appeals

    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


    ______________________________


    No. 06-04-00091-CR

    ______________________________



    SHAWN JEFFREY SHEPPARD, Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



                                                  


    On Appeal from the 188th Judicial District Court

    Gregg County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 31573-A



                                                     




    Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



    MEMORANDUM OPINION


                Shawn Jeffrey Sheppard appeals from his conviction on his open plea of guilty to the charge of robbery. The trial court assessed his punishment at forty years' imprisonment. During the same proceeding, he also pled guilty to charges of possession of a firearm by a felon and of habitual theft. He has appealed from the former charge, which is also decided this day in our opinion in Sheppard v. State, cause number 06-04-00092-CR. He did not appeal from his conviction for habitual theft.

                Sheppard raises a single issue on appeal: that the sentence imposed is a disproportionate punishment for the offense for which he was convicted.

                Before we can address this issue on the merits, it must be preserved for our review. In Jackson v. State, 989 S.W.2d 842, 845 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1999, no pet.), we held that a defendant is required to raise in the trial court at the time the sentence is imposed any objection he or she might have on the ground of disproportionality. In this case, Sheppard did not present this issue to the trial court by any means, by objection or otherwise; therefore, he did not preserve it for our review. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a); Delacruz v. State, No. 06-04-00062-CR, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. App.—Texarkana Jan. 4, 2004, no pet. h.); Hookie v. State, 136 S.W.3d 671, 679–80 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2004, no pet.); Alberto v. State, 100 S.W.3d 528, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2003, no pet.); Rodriguez v. State, 71 S.W.3d 778, 779 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.); Jackson, 989 S.W.2d at 844.

                We affirm the judgment.



                                                                            Jack Carter

                                                                            Justice

     

    Date Submitted:          December 9, 2004

    Date Decided:             January 4, 2005


    Do Not Publish

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-04-00091-CR

Filed Date: 1/4/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015