United States v. McGee, Keith , 157 F. App'x 894 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED ORDER
    Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    November 16, 2005
    Before
    Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge
    Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge
    Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                    ]   Appeals from the United
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                  ]   States District Court for
    ]   the Northern District of
    ]   Illinois, Eastern Division.
    Nos. 01-2493, 01-3071, 01-4027,              ]
    01-4139, 01-4235, 02-1130,              ]   No. 99 CR 952
    02-1136 and 02-2153                     ]
    ]   Ruben Castillo, Judge
    v.        ]
    ]
    KEITH MCGEE, THOMAS KING,                    ]
    LARONE BRIM, FLOZELL MCGEE,                  ]
    TONY BANKS,HAROLD MCKENZIE                   ]
    and RABBONI SMITH,                           ]
    Defendants-Appellants.               ]
    ORDER
    After concluding that the defendants’ convictions should be affirmed, we
    ordered a limited remand with regard to the sentences of defendants King, Smith,
    Keith McGee, Flozell McGee, Brim, McKinzie and Banks so that the district judge
    could determine whether the sentences he imposed were appropriate, given that the
    - over -
    Nos. 01-2493, 01-3071, 01-4027, 01-4139, 01-4235,
    02-1130, 02-1136 and 02-2153                                             Page 2
    federal sentencing guidelines are no longer mandatory. See United States v.
    Booker, 
    125 S. Ct. 735
     (2005).
    On limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 
    401 F.3d 471
     (7th Cir.
    2005), the district court was “unable to say that it would have imposed the same
    sentences in this unusual drug conspiracy case if it had known that the Sentencing
    Guidelines were merely advisory” and requested that the cases be “fully remanded
    for new resentencing proceedings.”
    All parties were offered the opportunity to respond before final resolution of
    the appeals. The defendants argue that their sentences should be vacated and their
    cases remanded for resentencing, and the government does not object to the district
    judge’s request for a full remand. Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED that the sentences of defendants King, Smith, Keith McGee,
    Flozell McGee, Brim, McKinzie and Banks are VACATED, and their cases are
    REMANDED for re-sentencing.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-2493

Citation Numbers: 157 F. App'x 894

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 11/16/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023