Joe Pecheles Volks v. Pecheles ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2588 JOE PECHELES VOLKSWAGON, INCORPORATED, a North Carolina Corporation; BRIAN L. PECHELES, Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus JOSEPH D. PECHELES, Defendant - Appellant, and ELMA PECHELES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-138-4-H2) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph D. Pecheles, Appellant Pro Se. Donalt J. Eglinton, Susan Pauline Ellis, WARD & SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joseph D. Pecheles appeals the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Plaintiffs-Appellees. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Joe Pecheles Volkswagon v. Pecheles, No. CA-96-138-4-H2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2