United States v. Rory Allen Gregory ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                                     ___________
    No. 96-3191
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                 *
    *
    v.                                 *   Appeal from the United States
    *   District Court for the
    Rory Allen Gregory, also known          *   Western District of Arkansas.
    as Roy Allen, also known as Roy         *
    Gregory,                                *         [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                *
    ___________
    Submitted:    January 3, 1997
    Filed:   January 10, 1997
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Rory Allen Gregory pleaded guilty to attempting to manufacture
    methcathinone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.              The
    1
    district court       sentenced him to 155 months' imprisonment.       Gregory
    appeals, and we affirm.
    Gregory challenges the district court’s drug-quantity findings.         We
    conclude, however, that the district court did not clearly err in adopting
    the presentence report's conservative approximations of the amount of drugs
    Gregory could have produced from the precursor chemicals found at his
    clandestine drug laboratory.        See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §
    2D1.1,
    1
    The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District
    Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
    comment. (n.12) (1995) (where there is no drug seizure, court shall
    approximate quantity of controlled substance; court may consider, among
    other things, size or capability of any laboratory involved); United States
    v. Scott, 
    91 F.3d 1058
    , 1062 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review).
    Gregory’s argument that such an approximation is proper only when all the
    necessary precursor chemicals are present is without merit.     See United
    States v. Beshore, 
    961 F.2d 1380
    , 1383-84 (8th Cir.) (even in absence of
    necessary precursor chemical, district court could properly approximate
    amount of controlled substance that could have been produced), cert.
    denied, 
    506 U.S. 884
    (1992); United States v. Havens, 
    910 F.2d 703
    , 705
    (10th Cir. 1990) (quantity of drugs should equal amount of drugs producible
    if chemicals possessed by defendant were combined with proportionate
    amounts of missing ingredients), cert. denied, 
    498 U.S. 1030
    (1991).
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-