Bobby Dean Lewis v. Danny Estes ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-1304
    ___________
    Bobby Dean Lewis,                         *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *
    v.                                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    Danny Estes, in his individual and his    * District Court for the
    official capacity as Sheriff of           * Western District of Missouri.
    Nodaway County, Missouri; Tray            *
    Pitts, in his individual capacity as      *
    Deputy Sheriff; D. L. Merrill, Trooper, *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    in his individual capacity; David A.      *
    Baird, Prosecuting Attorney for           *
    Nodaway County, Missouri, in his          *
    individual capacity; Roger Combs,         *
    Circuit Judge for Nodaway County,         *
    Missouri, in his individual capacity,     *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 6, 2000
    Filed: November 8, 2000
    ___________
    Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Missouri inmate Bobby Dean Lewis appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.
    § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he had sought a declaratory
    judgment against a judge, a prosecuting attorney, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, and a state
    trooper.
    Lewis argues this dismissal was erroneous because he paid his filing fee. We
    disagree. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (granting district court authority to review, before
    or immediately after docketing, all prisoners’ civil complaints that seek redress from
    governmental entities, officers, or employees; court shall dismiss actions that are, inter
    alia, frivolous or malicious); Rowe v. Shake, 
    196 F.3d 778
    , 781 (7th Cir. 1999) (based
    on plain statutory language, Ҥ 1915A applies to all prisoners, no matter their fee
    status, who bring suit against a government entity, officer, or employee”); Carr v.
    Dvorin, 
    171 F.3d 115
    , 116 (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A’s screening procedure
    applies to all civil complaints filed by prisoners, regardless of payment of filing fee);
    McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 
    114 F.3d 601
    , 608 (6th Cir. 1997) (same).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge
    for the Western District of Missouri.
    -2-