United States v. Lawrence Walker ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-1704
    ___________
    United States of America,                 *
    *
    Appellee,             * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Eastern
    v.                                  * District of Arkansas.
    *
    Lawrence Larnil Walker,                   *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.             *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 12, 2000
    Filed: September 19, 2000
    ___________
    Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Lawrence Larnil Walker appeals the denial of his motion to suppress drug and
    firearm evidence obtained in a search of his home and his mother's home. For reversal,
    Walker argues the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable
    cause because it contained information from confidential informants whose reliability
    had not been established. Contrary to Walker's view, the affidavit information that
    Walker delivered 12 grams of crack cocaine to a confidential informant in exchange for
    $200 was reliable because it came from a police detective, see Walden v. Carmack,
    
    156 F.3d 861
    , 870 (8th Cir. 1998), the informants' statements that Walker hid a bag of
    cocaine in a ditch beside his home and marijuana in an abandoned house were reliable
    because they were corroborated by the independent investigation of police officers, see
    
    id., and the
    informant's statement that Walker hid cocaine and cash at his mother's and
    girlfriend's residences was reliable because the informant had previously provided
    accurate information to police, see 
    id. We reject
    as meritless Walker's assertion that
    state law should govern this issue. See United States v. Tate, 
    821 F.2d 1328
    , 1330 (8th
    Cir. 1987) ("In a federal prosecution, the legality of a search and seizure is not
    determined by reference to a state statute, but . . . by fourth amendment analysis.").
    Because the affidavit provided an ample basis to establish probable cause for a search
    warrant, we affirm the denial of Walker's motion to suppress.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-1704

Filed Date: 9/19/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015