Quintin Adkins v. Marvin Morrison , 69 F. App'x 341 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-1005
    ___________
    Quintin Adkins,                       *
    *
    Appellant,               *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    United States Bureau of Prisons;      *
    Marvin D. Morrison, Warden of FCI     *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    Forrest City, Arkansas,               *
    *
    Appellees.               *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 17, 2003
    Filed: June 26, 2003
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Quintin Adkins appeals the district court’s* dismissal of Adkins's 28 U.S.C.
    § 2241 petition in which he sought credit against his federal heroin-trafficking
    sentence for time spent in official custody from April 24, 1997, through August 3,
    1999--the day his sentence was imposed. Following careful review, we conclude the
    *
    The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J.
    Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    district court properly denied section 2241 relief for the reasons expressed in the
    court’s opinion.
    In his objections to the magistrate’s report, and on appeal, Adkins argues he
    also was seeking credit for an earlier period beginning in December 1996, when he
    was arrested on the drug offense. Further, he insists he was in official detention
    between January 2 and February 28, 1997, when he was under twenty-four-hour
    supervision at a community correction center. Having reviewed the record, we find
    no indication that Adkins exhausted administrative remedies on these additional
    claims, and thus they are not properly raised at this time. See United States v.
    Chappel, 
    208 F.3d 1069
    , 1069-70 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (federal prisoners
    seeking jail-time credit must exhaust administrative remedies before seeking habeas
    relief).
    We affirm the dismissal of Adkins’s petition, but we clarify the dismissal is
    without prejudice to any future claim for pretrial-custody credit about a period other
    than April 24, 1997, through August 3, 1999.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1005

Citation Numbers: 69 F. App'x 341

Filed Date: 6/26/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023