United States v. Herlie Johnson , 91 F. App'x 531 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3157
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa
    Herlie Demonse Johnson, Jr., also      *
    known as Monze, also known as          *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    Monse,                                 *
    *
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 18, 2004
    Filed: March 24, 2004
    ___________
    Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Herlie Johnson appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1
    for the Northern District of Iowa upon revocation of his supervised release. The
    district court sentenced Johnson to 24 months imprisonment with no further
    1
    The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    supervised release. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the
    district court.
    In 2002 Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute less than 500 grams
    of powder cocaine in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. He was
    sentenced to 24 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On the
    government’s subsequent motion, Johnson’s sentence was reduced to 21 months
    imprisonment and 30 months supervised release. Johnson commenced supervised
    release in February 2003. In August 2003, the government petitioned for revocation
    based on his multiple positive drug tests and multiple failures to report for drug
    testing, all of which Johnson admitted.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the 24-month prison
    term imposed by the district court upon revocation does not exceed the statutory
    maximum, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy
    statements, and is not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 
    54 F.3d 489
    , 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).
    Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3157

Citation Numbers: 91 F. App'x 531

Filed Date: 3/24/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023