United States v. Jan Mengedoht , 343 F. App'x 158 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-3981
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    *
    v.                                *
    *
    Jan Major Mengedoht, Estate of Percy    *
    L. Hue,                                 *
    *
    Appellant.                    *
    ___________
    Appeals from the United States
    No. 08-3982                                 District Court for the
    ___________                                 District of Nebraska.
    United States of America,               *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    *
    v.                                *
    *
    Jan Major Mengedoht,                    *
    *
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 1, 2009
    Filed: September 2, 2009
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In these consolidated appeals, Jan Mengedoht challenges the validity of the
    district court’s1 orders enforcing summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service
    (IRS). We dismiss these appeals as untimely because the orders granting the
    government’s petitions for enforcement were entered in March 2007, and Mengedoht
    did not file his appeals until December 2008. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) (when
    United States is party, notice of appeal may be filed within 60 days after order
    appealed from is entered); United States v. Allee, 
    888 F.2d 208
    , 212 (1st Cir. 1989)
    (per curiam) (district court order enforcing IRS summons was final appealable order
    when it was issued; challenges to issuance of IRS summons and validity of order
    enforcing summons can, and must, be raised by timely appeal from date of issuance
    of enforcement order; fact that order directed party to do something--appear before
    IRS and claim, if desired, Fifth Amendment privilege--did not affect enforcement
    order’s finality for appeal purposes); cf. Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 
    440 F.3d 920
    , 923
    (8th Cir. 2006) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is mandatory and
    jurisdictional).
    Accordingly, we dismiss both appeals.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the District of Nebraska, adopting the reports and recommendations of the
    Honorable Thomas D. Thalken, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
    Nebraska.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-3981

Citation Numbers: 343 F. App'x 158

Filed Date: 9/2/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023