United States v. Shondo Billie , 226 F. App'x 631 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-4457
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * District of North Dakota.
    Shondo Billie,                          *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 5, 2007
    Filed: April 10, 2007
    ___________
    Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    A jury found Shondo Billie guilty of one count of sexual abuse of a minor, in
    violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a), and four counts of aggravated sexual abuse of a
    minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c). The district court1 sentenced him to 230
    months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, counsel has filed a
    brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), containing a request to
    withdraw. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
    1
    The Honorable Daniel Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the District of North Dakota.
    Counsel argues that the district court erred by denying the defense’s motion in
    limine to exclude any evidence of additional, similar abuses by Billie against the same
    victim during the same approximate period of time. We conclude that the district
    court did not abuse its discretion by admitting this evidence under Federal Rules of
    Evidence 413 and 414 because, in the circumstances of this case, the probative value
    of the evidence was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
    See United States v. Benais, 
    460 F.3d 1059
    , 1063 (8th Cir. 2006) (upholding
    admission of evidence of other sexual assaults under Fed. R. Evid. 413 and 414 when
    applying Fed. R. Evid. 403’s balancing test).
    Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), and having found no non-frivolous issues for appeal, we affirm the judgment
    of the district court and grant counsel’s request to withdraw. We deny Billie’s
    pending motion for substitute counsel.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-4457

Citation Numbers: 226 F. App'x 631

Filed Date: 4/10/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023