Jeannie Ball v. St. Louis County ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-1755
    ___________________________
    Jeannie Ball
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    St. Louis County
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
    ____________
    Submitted: December 7, 2012
    Filed: December 12, 2012
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jeannie Ball appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting
    summary judgment to St. Louis County in Ball’s action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and
    1
    The Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District
    of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the
    parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    1983, where she alleged that the County discriminated against her because of her
    Native American origin. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment record, we
    conclude that Ball did not present sufficient evidence that any County employee was
    guilty of actionable discrimination, so her claims under §§ 1981 and 1983 must fail.
    See Bediako v. Stein Mart, Inc., 
    354 F.3d 835
    , 838–39 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of
    review). Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1755

Judges: Loken, Bowman, Colloton

Filed Date: 12/12/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2024