United States v. Aimee Rosenbaum ( 2023 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2014
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Aimee L. Rosenbaum
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: December 30, 2022
Filed: January 12, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Aimee Rosenbaum appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after she
pleaded guilty to conversion and bankruptcy fraud pursuant to a plea agreement
1
The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
containing an appeal waiver. Her appellate counsel has moved to withdraw, and has
filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that prior
counsel provided ineffective assistance during Rosenbaum’s post-plea proceedings.
While the appeal waiver does not prohibit ineffective-assistance claims, we
decline to consider such claims on direct appeal without an adequately developed
record. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir. 2006);
United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746, 749 (8th Cir. 2002). We have also
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and
have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the waiver.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-