Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hill Country Farms, Inc. , 564 F. App'x 868 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 13-2796
    ___________________________
    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Hill Country Farms, Inc., doing business as Henry’s Turkey Services
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
    ____________
    Submitted: May 5, 2014
    Filed: May 8, 2014
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    This is an appeal following entry of judgment against appellant in a suit
    brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for violations
    of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). During the course of the proceedings,
    appellant moved to vacate the district court’s1 order entering an adverse grant of
    partial summary judgment in favor of the EEOC, arguing that the order was void
    because an allegedly indispensable third party had not been joined as a defendant.
    Following a hearing, the district court denied the motion. Eventually, a jury found
    appellant liable for the remaining ADA violations and awarded damages, and
    following entry of judgment, this appeal was filed.
    For reversal, appellant argues that (1) the EEOC “erred” in failing to join the
    indispensable third party, and (2) the district court erred in admitting certain evidence
    at trial. Construing the first point as a challenge to the denial of the motion to vacate,
    we conclude that the district court did not err in refusing to vacate the order of partial
    summary judgment, see Minn. Milk Producers Ass’n v. Glickman, 
    153 F.3d 632
    ,
    646-47 (8th Cir. 1998); and as to the second point, appellant does not direct us to any
    objection in the record to admission of the evidence at issue, and we see no plain
    error in its admission, see Nemmers v. Ford Motor Co., 
    686 F.3d 486
    , 490 (8th Cir.
    2012). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern
    District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-2796

Citation Numbers: 564 F. App'x 868

Judges: Bowman, Kelly, Per Curiam, Wollman

Filed Date: 5/8/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023