John Lee Ivy v. United States ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                                     ___________
    No. 95-2924
    ___________
    John Lee Ivy,                            *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                                  *   District Court for the
    *   Eastern District of Missouri.
    United States of America,                *
    *           [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted:     April 3, 1996
    Filed:   April 12, 1996
    ___________
    Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    John Lee Ivy appeals the District Court's1 denial of his 28 U.S.C.
    § 2255 motion, in which he argued that his criminal conviction constituted
    double jeopardy because of a previous civil forfeiture.      We affirm as the
    motion, files, and records conclusively show Ivy was not entitled to
    relief.   See United States v. Duke, 
    50 F.3d 571
    , 576 (8th Cir.) (standard
    of review), cert. denied, 
    116 S. Ct. 224
    (1995); United States v. Sykes,
    
    73 F.3d 772
    , 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996) (defendant who did not contest civil
    forfeiture was not party to forfeiture proceeding and therefore was not
    placed in prior jeopardy); United States v. Clementi, 
    70 F.3d 997
    , 999-1000
    & n.4 (8th Cir. 1995).
    1
    The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District
    Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-