United States v. Thedell Doss, Jr. , 449 F. App'x 544 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-1470
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Missouri.
    Thedell Doss, Jr.,                       *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 14, 2011
    Filed: November 25, 2011
    ___________
    Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BEAM and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Thedell Doss, Jr., pleaded guilty to distribution of heroin in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). He completed his 200-month sentence of
    imprisonment and began a five-year term of supervised release on August 2, 2006. On
    February 8, 2011, Doss's probation officer moved to revoke supervision alleging Doss
    had violated the conditions of his release by committing another crime, namely,
    trafficking in drugs in violation of Missouri state law. Doss admitted the violation but
    opposed the petition to revoke his supervised release arguing he could not be subject
    to revocation because he had been on supervised release for more than three years.
    He claimed his five-year term of supervised release was improper because it exceeded
    the three-year period authorized by 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (b)(2) for a Class C felony such
    as his.
    The district court1 concluded the five-year term of supervised release imposed
    by the original sentencing court was authorized by 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(C), revoked
    Doss's supervised release, and sentenced him to an additional twenty-four months of
    imprisonment. Doss filed a timely appeal renewing the argument that his original
    five-year term of supervised released was improper.
    The three-year limit on supervised release for Class C felonies under
    § 3583(b)(2) applies only "[e]xcept as otherwise provided." 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (b). "In
    United States v. LeMay, 
    952 F.2d 995
    , 998 (8th Cir. 1991), we held that the
    maximum-term limitations in 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (b) do not apply when a statute such
    as 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b) expressly authorizes a longer term of supervised release."
    United States v. Scott, 
    243 F.3d 1103
    , 1108 (8th Cir. 2001). Here, Doss was
    sentenced "to a term of supervised release that did not exceed the maximum term
    authorized under 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(C) ('at least 3 years')" and thus there was no
    error. Id.; see also United States v. Deans, 
    590 F.3d 907
    , 911 (8th Cir. 2010) ("[T]he
    relevant sentencing statute, 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(C), expressly trumps the generally
    applicable terms of supervised release set forth in 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (b)."); United
    States v. Bongiorno, 
    139 F.3d 640
    , 640-41 (8th Cir. 1998) (following LeMay).
    We therefore affirm.
    _____________________________
    1
    The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1470

Citation Numbers: 449 F. App'x 544

Judges: Beam, Bye, Per Curiam, Riley

Filed Date: 11/25/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023