John A. Fuller v. United States ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                          United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 96-3658EM
    _____________
    John A. Fuller,                          *
    *
    Appellant,           * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Eastern
    v.                                 * District of Missouri.
    *
    United States of America,                *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.            *
    _____________
    Submitted: February 5, 1998
    Filed: March 3, 1998
    _____________
    Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    _____________
    PER CURIAM.
    John A. Fuller appeals the district court's order denying his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    motion. Relying on counsel's failure to raise the issue in this appeal at sentencing or
    on direct appeal, Fuller contends his fifteen-year sentence for being a felon in
    possession of a firearm should be set aside because two of his three earlier felony
    convictions relied on for sentencing under 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (a)(1) should have been
    excluded as predicate convictions under 
    18 U.S.C. § 921
    (a)(20). We disasgree and
    affirm.
    Fuller contends 
    Mo. Rev. Stat. § 560.610
     (1969) (repealed in 1979) exempted
    him from forfeiture of his civil rights because the challenged convictions for robbery
    and burglary occurred when he was under twenty years of age, and he would have
    retained his right to vote, to hold office, and to serve as a juror. Although Fuller
    correctly argues that now-repealed § 560.610 exempted Fuller from the disqualification
    of rights that would have otherwise resulted from his robbery and burglary convictions,
    the statute did not exempt Fuller from losing rights under other statutes then in effect.
    See 
    Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 494.020
     (1969) (repealed in 1989) (convicted felons ineligible
    for jury service), 57.010 (1994) (convicted felons ineligible for election to office of
    sheriff), and 43.060 (1994) (convicted felons ineligible for highway patrol service).
    Thus, Fuller's civil rights were not fully restored within the meaning of § 921(a)(20).
    See Presley v. United States, 
    851 F.2d 1052
    , 1053 (8th Cir. 1988). Fuller did not claim
    that his civil rights had been restored under any other Missouri statute.
    We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-3658

Filed Date: 3/3/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021