United States v. Ricky Lynn Davis ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 99-3677
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Missouri
    Ricky Lynn Davis,                        *
    *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 29, 2000
    Filed: April 10, 2000
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
    Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Ricky Lynn Davis appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1
    for the Eastern District of Missouri upon his guilty plea to being a felon in possession
    of a firearm, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1). The district court sentenced
    appellant to eighty-five months imprisonment and three years supervised release. For
    reversal, Davis argues that the court erred in applying a four-level enhancement under
    1
    The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) (1998) for possessing the firearm in connection with another
    felony offense, the circumstances of which were testified to at sentencing by Davis’s
    ex-girlfriend. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district
    court.
    We reject Davis’s challenge to his ex-girlfriend’s credibility. The district court’s
    decision to credit her testimony is virtually unreviewable on appeal, and we are
    unpersuaded that it should be disturbed in this case. See United States v. Johnson, 
    169 F.3d 1092
    , 1098 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    120 S. Ct. 143
     (1999). We also find no merit
    to Davis’s argument that the district court erred in failing to make specific credibility
    findings. See United States v. Moss, 
    138 F.3d 742
    , 745 (8th Cir. 1998) (rejecting
    argument that district court neglected to make specific credibility findings in light of
    conflicting witness testimony, where it was apparent which witness’s testimony court
    had credited).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-3677

Filed Date: 4/10/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021