Eldon Bugg v. James Rutter , 453 F. App'x 663 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-2533
    ___________
    Eldon K. Bugg,                        *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    James L. Rutter; Jean Goldstein,      *
    *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellees.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 6, 2012
    Filed: February 15, 2012
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Eldon Bugg appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion under Federal Rule
    of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), in which he asked the court to “clarify” that its dismissal
    of his action had been without prejudice as to the state-law claims he had raised. We
    conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bugg’s motion: the
    dismissal order in question had dismissed his state-law claims with prejudice, and no
    other exceptional circumstances existed meriting Rule 60(b)(6) relief. See Murphy
    v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 
    506 F.3d 1111
    , 1117 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review; Rule
    1
    The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    60(b)(6) provides relief only where exceptional circumstances denied moving party
    full and fair opportunity to litigate claim and prevented moving party from receiving
    adequate redress); Caldwell v. Camp, 
    594 F.2d 705
    , 707 n.2 (8th Cir. 1979)
    (involuntary dismissal is with prejudice unless otherwise specified by the district court
    or Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) exception); cf. Hassett v. Lemay Bank & Trust Co., 
    851 F.2d 1127
    , 1130 (8th Cir. 1988) (state-law claims not explicitly addressed by district court
    order dismissing all claims must be construed as dismissed without prejudice).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-2533

Citation Numbers: 453 F. App'x 663

Judges: Arnold, Murphy, Per Curiam, Shepherd

Filed Date: 2/15/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023