United States v. Santoscoy-Martinez , 85 F. App'x 544 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-2531
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Western
    * District of Arkansas.
    Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez,               *
    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: January 15, 2004
    Filed: January 21, 2004
    ___________
    Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United
    States after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation
    of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a) and (b)(2). The district court1 sentenced him to 46 months
    imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s
    counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), arguing that (1) the district court erred in enhancing Mr. Santoscoy-
    1
    The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    Martinez’s sentence based on a Texas burglary conviction, because he received
    ineffective assistance of counsel in that case; and (2) the court should have granted
    a downward departure based on Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s overrepresented criminal
    history.
    After careful review, we reject these arguments. Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez
    cannot, in these proceedings, collaterally attack his prior state sentence based on
    ineffective assistance of counsel, see United States v. Jones, 
    28 F.3d 69
    , 70 (8th Cir.
    1994) (per curiam); and the departure argument is unreviewable, because there is no
    indication the district court believed it lacked authority to depart, see United States
    v. Moore, 
    245 F.3d 1023
    , 1026 (8th Cir. 2001).
    Finally, we have reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v.
    Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we
    affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-2531

Citation Numbers: 85 F. App'x 544

Filed Date: 1/21/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023