United States v. Victor Servin , 145 F. App'x 565 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-4147
    ___________
    United States of America,             *
    *
    Appellee,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * District of Nebraska.
    Victor Manuel Moreno Servin,          *
    also known as Jose Alfredo Martinez, * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 7, 2005
    Filed: October 13, 2005
    ___________
    Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Victor Manuel Moreno Servin pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine,
    in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the district court1 sentenced him to 51
    months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed
    a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). Counsel argues that the
    district court erred in determining the drug quantity for which Servin was responsible
    and sentencing him accordingly.
    1
    The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District
    of Nebraska.
    We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding the drug
    quantity attributable to Servin. See United States v. Milton, 
    153 F.3d 891
    , 898 (8th
    Cir. 1998) (standard of review), cert. denied, 
    525 U.S. 1165
    (1999). The district court
    heard live testimony from Servin and an individual to whom he had distributed drugs,
    and the court’s decision to discredit Servin’s denials in favor of the other witness’s
    testimony was not clear error. See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 
    470 U.S. 564
    ,
    575 (1985) (credibility determinations are virtually never clear error). A conservative
    drug-quantity estimate drawn from that witness’s testimony falls well within the 50-
    to-200-gram range used to establish Servin’s base offense level.
    Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-4147

Citation Numbers: 145 F. App'x 565

Filed Date: 10/13/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023