Phillip Davis v. David Dormire , 19 F. App'x 452 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 01-2502
    ___________
    Phillip Davis,                             *
    *
    Appellant,                    *   Appeal from the United States
    *   District Court for the
    v.                                   *   Western District of Missouri.
    *
    David Dormire, et al.,                     *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellees.                    *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 7, 2001
    Filed: September 20, 2001
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Phillip Davis, a Missouri inmate, was charged with several rule violations,
    including assault, arson, and possessing an intoxicating substance. He was found guilty
    on each of these charges and received time in administrative segregation. He grieved
    the decisions but did not receive rulings on all of his grievances. He also was placed
    in a strip cell on two occasions. Based on these allegations, Davis brought this 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action against various prison officials, alleging violations of his First,
    Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court1 dismissed Davis’s
    complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and Davis appeals. Upon careful de novo review
    of the record, we affirm.
    Davis’s allegations do not establish (1) that his transfer to administrative
    segregation “impose[d] atypical and significant hardship on [Davis] in relation to the
    ordinary incidents of prison life” as is required to trigger due process protection, see
    Sandin v. Connor, 
    515 U.S. 472
    , 484 (1995); (2) that prison officials knew of and
    disregarded an excessive risk to Davis’s health and safety from his stays in the strip
    cell, see Williams v. Delo, 
    49 F.3d 442
    , 445 (8th Cir. 1995); or (3) that any failure to
    process his grievances actually prejudiced him, see Farver v. Vilches, 
    155 F.3d 978
    ,
    979-80 (8th Cir. 1998).
    Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Davis’s motion for appointment of counsel.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the
    HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-2502

Citation Numbers: 19 F. App'x 452

Filed Date: 9/20/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023