United States v. Herson Castaneda , 49 F. App'x 92 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-1768
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * District of Nebraska.
    Herson Castaneda,                       *
    *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 11, 2002
    Filed: October 28, 2002
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Herson Castaneda (Castaneda) pled guilty to aiding and abetting the fraudulent
    misuse of identification documents, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 1546
    (a) and 2. The
    district court1 granted, in part, Castaneda’s motion for a downward departure,
    reducing his total offense level by 2 levels and arriving at a Guidelines imprisonment
    range of 18-24 months. The court then sentenced him to 18 months imprisonment
    and 3 years supervised release. Castaneda appeals, arguing his sentence is excessive.
    1
    The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the District of Nebraska.
    Castaneda's challenge to the extent of the downward departure is unreviewable,
    see United States v. Puckett, 
    147 F.3d 765
    , 772 (8th Cir. 1998), as is the district
    court’s refusal to depart on the proffered ground that the case was outside the
    heartland of cases, see United States v. Riza, 
    267 F.3d 757
    , 758-59 (8th Cir. 2001)
    (district court’s decision not to depart downward is unreviewable so long as court was
    aware of its authority to depart; court is presumed to be aware of scope of ability to
    depart downward). Castaneda does not otherwise argue his sentence was imposed in
    violation of law; and the sentence fell within the applicable Guidelines range, which
    did not span more than 24 months. See United States v. Woodrum, 
    959 F.2d 100
    , 101
    (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).
    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1768

Citation Numbers: 49 F. App'x 92

Filed Date: 10/28/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023