Kathleen A. Cochrane v. NALC , 51 F. App'x 200 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-2410
    ___________
    Kathleen A. Cochrane,                 *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Southern District of Iowa.
    National Association of Letter        *
    Carriers, AFL-CIO, Local Division,    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Branch 352; United States Postal      *
    Service,                              *
    *
    Appellee.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 29, 2002
    Filed: December 3, 2002
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Kathleen Cochrane brought this action against her former employer, the United
    States Postal Service (USPS), and her former union, the National Association of
    Letter Carriers, and its Local Division, Branch 352 (collectively NALC), alleging that
    USPS had violated its collective bargaining agreement with NALC, and that NALC
    had breached its duty to fairly represent her. The district court1 granted summary
    judgment to USPS and NALC, and Cochrane appeals. After careful review of the
    record, we affirm.
    The evidence before the district court did not create a genuine issue of material
    fact on whether NALC had breached its duty of fair representation. First, the record
    fails to show arbitrary conduct by NALC. Instead, the evidence demonstrates that
    NALC investigated Cochrane’s claim, and concluded, based upon its interpretation
    of the collective bargaining agreement and the circumstances of Cochrane’s case, that
    she did not have a grievable complaint. Further, there is no evidence that NALC
    acted in bad faith or with discriminatory intent. See Schmidt v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec.
    Workers, Local 949, 
    980 F.2d 1167
    , 1170 (8th Cir. 1992).
    As Cochrane was required to show a breach of the duty of fair representation
    to prevail against either defendant, see Scott v. United Auto., Local 879, 
    242 F.3d 837
    , 840 (8th Cir. 2001), summary judgment was also appropriate on her claim
    against USPS for breach of the collective bargaining agreement, see Buford v.
    Runyon, 
    160 F.3d 1199
    , 1203 (8th Cir. 1998).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the
    Southern District of Iowa.
    -2-