United States v. Daniel F. Ward , 55 F. App'x 393 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-3292
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    v.                                * Western District of Missouri.
    *
    Daniel F. Ward,                         *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: January 15, 2003
    Filed: January 22, 2003
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Daniel Ward pleaded guilty to health care fraud, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 1347
     and 2. After increasing Ward’s base offense level for abusing a position of
    public or private trust, the district court1 imposed a sentence of 5 months
    imprisonment and 5 months home detention, 3 years supervised release, and
    restitution of $49,944.01. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief
    under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), arguing that the district court erred
    in applying the abuse-of-trust increase.
    1
    The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for
    the Western District of Missouri.
    The district court did not err. Ward occupied a position of trust--which he
    abused--with respect to Medicare, because he was able to defraud Medicare by
    certifying that in his professional judgment treatment was medically necessary and
    had been provided. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, comment. (n.1); United States v. Hodge,
    
    259 F.3d 549
    , 556-57 (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. Hoogenboom, 
    209 F.3d 665
    ,
    671 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Rutgard, 
    116 F.3d 1270
    , 1293 (9th Cir. 1997).
    Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988),
    we find no nonfrivolous issue.
    Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-