United States v. Ronald D. Lang , 60 F. App'x 651 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-3234
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the Western
    * District of Missouri
    Ronald D. Lang,                         *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 4, 2003
    Filed: April 7, 2003
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, MURPHY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Ronald D. Lang appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1
    for the Western District of Missouri after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to
    manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
     and
    846. The district court sentenced Lang to 168 months imprisonment and 3 years
    supervised release. Counsel has moved to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and has filed a brief raising a claim of ineffective
    assistance of counsel at sentencing. Lang has moved for appointment of substitute
    1
    The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    counsel, contending counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence and
    witnesses that Lang had requested. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the
    judgment of the district court.
    Because the record is undeveloped as to the alleged ineffective assistance of
    counsel, we decline to address the issue in this direct criminal appeal. See United
    States v. Woods, 
    270 F.3d 728
    , 730 (8th Cir. 2001) (except where miscarriage of
    justice would obviously result or outcome would be inconsistent with substantial
    justice, ineffective assistance issues are more appropriately raised in collateral
    proceedings), cert. denied, 
    535 U.S. 948
     (2002). Moreover, we have reviewed the
    record independently for any nonfrivolous issues, see Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), and we have found none.
    Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw; we deny Lang’s motion
    for substitute counsel; and we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-3234

Citation Numbers: 60 F. App'x 651

Filed Date: 4/7/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023