Kareem Farrakhan v. City of Omaha , 170 F. App'x 17 ( 2006 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3960
___________
Kareem Dawud Farrakhan, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
City of Omaha, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 28, 2006
Filed: March 7, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this interlocutory appeal, Kareem Farrakhan challenges the district court’s1
denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin a state court
condemnation proceeding. Following careful review of the record, we find that the
district court did not abuse its broad discretion in denying the requested injunction.
See Manion v. Nagin, 255 F.3d 535, 538 (8th Cir. 2001) (district court has broad
discretion when ruling on requests for preliminary injunctions, and court of appeals
reverses only for clearly erroneous factual determinations, error of law, or abuse of
1
The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
discretion). Farrakhan’s remaining arguments are meritless. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-