United States v. L. Herrera-Gonzalez , 67 F. App'x 383 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-1076
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the Southern
    * District of Iowa.
    Luis Herrera-Gonzalez,                  *
    *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 20, 2003
    Filed: June 27, 2003
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Luis Herrera-Gonzalez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute five hundred
    grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine. The District
    Court1 sentenced him to 120 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised
    release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders
    v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), arguing that the sentence was too long.
    1
    The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the
    Southern District of Iowa.
    We reject this argument. The drug quantity involved in the offense to which
    Herrera-Gonzalez pleaded guilty subjected him to a minimum of ten years in prison,
    see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (2000), and that was the term imposed. See United
    States v. Vong, 
    171 F.3d 648
    , 654 (8th Cir. 1999) (explaining that by pleading guilty,
    defendant admitted all factual allegations made in indictment); cf. United States v.
    Chacon, No. 02-3008, 
    2003 WL 21295098
    , at *1 (8th Cir. June 6, 2003) (holding that
    district court properly granted government’s motion to correct sentence where court
    originally sentenced defendant below statutory minimum and only avenues for
    departure were not open to defendant).
    Upon reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also
    grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1076

Citation Numbers: 67 F. App'x 383

Filed Date: 6/27/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023