United States v. Jorge Fuentes , 79 F. App'x 239 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-1206
    ___________
    United States of America,             *
    *
    Appellee,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * District of Minnesota.
    Jorge Alvarez Fuentes, also known as *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    Alejandro Alvavit Gomes,              *
    *
    Appellant.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 15, 2003
    Filed: October 21, 2003
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    After Jorge Alvarez Fuentes (Fuentes) pleaded guilty to possession with intent
    to distribute in excess of 500 grams of cocaine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1)
    and (b)(1)(B), the district court1 sentenced him to 37 months’ imprisonment and 3
    years’ supervised release. He appeals, and we affirm.
    1
    The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    For reversal, Fuentes argues that the district court erred in denying him a 2-
    level minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b), because he acted merely as a
    courier in the offense. A minor participant is one who is less culpable than most
    other participants in the offense, but whose role could not be described as minimal.
    See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) & comment. (n.5). The defendant bears the burden of
    demonstrating that he is entitled to such a reduction, see United States v. Lopez-Arce,
    
    267 F.3d 775
    , 784 (8th Cir. 2001), and we review for clear error the district court’s
    denial of the reduction, see United States v. White, 
    241 F.3d 1015
    , 1024 (8th Cir.
    2001).
    The district court did not clearly err. The undisputed facts indicate that Fuentes
    was deeply involved in the offense as both a contact person and a courier, and he was
    caught with a significant amount of cocaine. See United States v. Alverez, 
    235 F.3d 1086
    , 1090 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
    532 U.S. 1031
     (2001); United States v.
    Thompson, 
    60 F.3d 514
    , 518 (8th Cir. 1995).
    The judgment is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -2-