Tony J. Brown v. Trane Co. , 103 F. App'x 926 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3104
    ___________
    Tony J. Brown,                          *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Western District of Arkansas.
    Trane Company,                          *
    *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: July 28, 2004
    Filed: August 3, 2004
    ___________
    Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Following a jury trial, Tony Brown appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant
    of a directed verdict on certain claims in his employment-discrimination action. We
    cannot review these rulings, however, because Brown did not provide a trial
    transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Pargo v. First Realty Prop. Mgmt., No. 93-
    1500, 
    1994 WL 83267
    , at *1 (8th Cir. Mar. 16, 1994) (unpublished per curiam) (any
    meaningful review of trial court’s factual findings was precluded where appellant
    failed to provide transcript after appeals court denied request for transcript at
    1
    The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    government expense), cert. denied, 
    513 U.S. 847
     (1994). Further, while Brown
    challenges the district court’s refusal to submit a requested jury instruction on
    disability, and the court’s refusal to admit into evidence an administrative
    determination, his brief contains no argument as to why either ruling was an abuse
    of discretion. See Otting v. J.C. Penney Co., 
    223 F.3d 704
    , 712-13 (8th Cir. 2000)
    (refusal to submit jury instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion; instruction
    defining disability must fairly and adequately submit issue of disability to jury); Doss
    v. Frontenac, 
    14 F.3d 1313
    , 1318 (8th Cir. 1994) (in employment-discrimination case,
    decision whether to admit or exclude administrative findings is properly left to sound
    discretion of trial court). Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3104

Citation Numbers: 103 F. App'x 926

Filed Date: 8/3/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023