United States v. Shaw , 109 F. App'x 702 ( 2004 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 27, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-30390
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHERMAN SHAW,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:03-CR-30048-ALL
--------------------
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Sherman Shaw appeals from his sentence following a guilty
plea conviction for the misdemeanor of taking or attempting to
take doves with a gun capable of holding more than three shells,
in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703,
and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(b). The magistrate judge sentenced Sherman
pursuant to the court's authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3402 to one
year of probation, a $300 fine, and a $10 special assessment. As
a special condition of probation, the magistrate judge ordered
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-30390
-2-
that Shaw's hunting privileges were suspended during the
probationary term. The district court affirmed the MJ's
sentence.
Shaw argues that the imposition of probation and the loss of
his hunting privileges are inherently unfair. Shaw faced a
maximum sentence of six months in prison, a $15,000 fine, or
both. See 16 U.S.C. § 707. Shaw admitted at his rearraignment
that he knowingly violated the requirements of 16 U.S.C. § 703and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(b). We conclude that the MJ's sentence was
not plainly unreasonable or an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Sandle, 123 F.3d 809, 810 (5th Cir. 1997); United
States v. Merritt, 639 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1981); 18 U.S.C.
§ 3742(a)(4).
AFFIRMED.