United States v. Castillo-Torrecilla , 111 F. App'x 444 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1556
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Southern District of Iowa.
    Gonzalo Castillo-Torrecilla,             *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 7, 2004
    Filed: October 19, 2004
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Gonzalo Castillo-Torrecilla appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed
    after he pleaded guilty to knowingly transporting illegal aliens within the United
    States for financial gain, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1324
    (a)(1)(A)(ii), (A)(v)(II), and
    (B)(i). At sentencing, over Castillo-Torrecilla’s objection, the district court imposed
    an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) (offense-level enhancement for
    intentionally or recklessly creating substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury
    to another person), based on its finding that Castillo-Torrecilla had transported 18
    1
    The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the
    Southern District of Iowa.
    persons, including himself, in a vehicle suited to seat 9-10. The court sentenced
    Castillo-Torrecilla to 21 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On
    appeal, Castillo-Torrecilla challenges the enhancement.
    We find the district court did not clearly err in imposing the section 2L1.1(b)(5)
    enhancement. See United States v. Kanatzar, 
    370 F.3d 810
    , 814 (8th Cir. 2004)
    (standard of review); United States v. Flores-Flores, 
    356 F.3d 861
    , 863 (8th Cir.
    2004) (upholding § 2L1.1(b)(5) enhancement based on overcrowded vehicle); United
    States v. Ortiz, 
    242 F.3d 1078
    , 1079 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (same).
    Accordingly, we affirm. Castillo-Torrecilla’s motion to file a supplemental
    brief in light of Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
     (2004), is denied.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1556

Citation Numbers: 111 F. App'x 444

Filed Date: 10/19/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023