United States v. Gustavo Lopez-Tapia , 111 F. App'x 867 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3807
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * District of Nebraska
    Gustavo Lopez-Tapia,                    *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 7, 2004
    Filed: November 12, 2004
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Gustavo Lopez-Tapia appeals from the final judgment entered in the District
    1
    Court for the District of Nebraska upon his plea of guilty to conspiring to distribute
    and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
    § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court sentenced appellant to 240 months
    imprisonment and 10 years supervised release. For reversal, counsel for appellant
    argues the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for downward
    departure based on family hardship. Appellant has moved pro se to file a
    1
    The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the District of Nebraska.
    supplemental brief based on Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    (2004). For the
    reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    After carefully reviewing the record, and in particular the written and oral
    remarks of the district court, we conclude that the court was fully aware of its
    authority to depart downward but declined to do so based on the facts of this case.
    Thus, we hold that the district court made a discretionary decision not to depart
    downward, which is unreviewable. See United States v. Walterman, 
    343 F.3d 938
    ,
    942 (8th Cir. 2003).
    Given that appellant received the statutory minimum sentence, see 21 U.S.C.
    § 841(b)(1)(A), with no enhancements based on judicially found facts, we conclude
    that supplemental briefing based on Blakely is unnecessary.
    Accordingly, we deny the pending motion, and we affirm the judgment of the
    district court.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3807

Citation Numbers: 111 F. App'x 867

Filed Date: 11/12/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023