Chris Krych v. Wendell Anderson , 112 F. App'x 547 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1520
    ___________
    Chris R. Krych,                           *
    *
    Appellant,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    Howard Lansing Hines; Robert Monge; * District Court for the
    Emil Johnson; Wardell Hicks, and on * District of Minnesota.
    behalf of all others similarly situated, *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Plaintiffs,                 *
    *
    v.                                  *
    *
    Wendell Anderson, individually and as *
    Governor of the State of Minnesota;       *
    Kenneth Schoen, individually and as       *
    Corrections Commissioner for the State *
    of Minnesota; Bruce McManus,              *
    individually and as Warden of the         *
    Minnesota State Prison; James Cicero, *
    individually and as Medical Director of *
    the Minnesota State Prison; Warren        *
    Lawson, individually and as Secretary *
    and Executive Officer of the Minnesota *
    State Board of Health,                    *
    *
    Appellees.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 5, 2004
    Filed: November 16, 2004
    ___________
    Before BYE, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Minnesota inmate Chris Krych, who is currently housed in the Administrative
    Control Unit of the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Oak Park Heights, appeals the
    district court’s1 denial of his motion for contempt, which he brought pursuant to a
    consent decree entered in Hines v. Anderson, 
    439 F. Supp. 12
     (D. Minn. 1977).
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we cannot say the district court abused
    its discretion in finding that the defendants substantially complied with the Hines
    decree, and thus in denying Krych’s contempt motion. See Wycoff v. Hedgepeth, 
    34 F.3d 614
    , 616 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review; substantial, good-faith compliance
    is defense).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also deny Krych’s motion
    for release.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.
    Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1520

Citation Numbers: 112 F. App'x 547

Filed Date: 11/16/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023