Howard v. Astrue , 268 F. App'x 341 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM: *

    The only legal question before this court, and the only question over which we have jurisdiction, is the legal correctness of the district court’s judgment entered on August 1, 2007. That presents the question of whether substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision and computation of Mr. Howard’s Social Security benefits. This court agrees with the district court and affirms that judgment.

    AFFIRMED.

    *

    Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-51053

Citation Numbers: 268 F. App'x 341

Judges: Barksdale, Benavides, Per Curiam, Reavley

Filed Date: 3/6/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023