James Widtfeldt v. Michael Johanns , 290 F. App'x 963 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 07-1284
    ___________
    James Widtfeldt; James Widtfeldt         *
    Trust,                                   *
    *
    Appellants,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * District of Nebraska.
    1
    Ed Schafer, in his capacity as Secretary *
    of the United States Department of       * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Agriculture; United States Department *
    of Agriculture; Monte Fletcher, in his *
    official capacity as Holt County         *
    Executive Director of the United States *
    Farm Service Agency, an Agency of        *
    the United States Department of          *
    Agriculture; Richard Kilmurry; Bonny *
    Kilmurry; Hilger Brothers Partnerships; *
    Gary A. Burival; Joyce A. Burival;       *
    Edwin Burival,                           *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: August 29, 2008
    Filed: September 4, 2008
    ___________
    1
    Ed Schafer has been appointed to serve as the Secretary of the United States
    Department of Agriculture, and is substituted as an appellee pursuant to Federal Rule
    of Appellate Procedure 43(c).
    Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    James Widtfeldt appeals the district court’s2 adverse grant of summary
    judgment in this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative
    Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) & (2), challenging an order of the United
    States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which found him ineligible for federal
    farm subsidies for the years 2000 and 2001 and required him to refund approximately
    $29,000 in payments he received for those years. Upon de novo review, we agree
    with the district court that the USDA’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse
    of discretion, or otherwise inconsistent with the law. See Voyageurs Nat’l Park Ass’n
    v. Norton, 
    381 F.3d 759
    , 763 (8th Cir. 2004) (appellate standard of review and
    applicable legal standard under APA). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court
    is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    2
    The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the District of Nebraska.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1284

Citation Numbers: 290 F. App'x 963

Filed Date: 9/4/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023