Albert Trammell, Sr. v. New Prime, Inc. , 367 F. App'x 730 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 09-2359
    ___________
    Albert Allen Trammell, Sr.,              *
    *
    Appellant,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    New Prime, Inc.; Robert Lowe;            *
    Lawanda Lowe; Vera Lowe,                 * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellees.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 2, 2010
    Filed: March 16, 2010
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Albert Trammell appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint, which
    was liberally construed as asserting fraud and wrongful termination under Missouri
    law, and wrongful termination under 49 U.S.C. § 31105(a). After careful de novo
    review, see Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp., 
    517 F.3d 544
    , 549 (8th Cir. 2008),
    we agree with the district court’s dismissal order, see 49 U.S.C. § 31105(b)(1)
    (“employee alleging discharge . . . in violation of subsection (a) of this section . . .
    1
    The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    may file a complaint with the Secretary of Labor not later than 180 days after alleged
    violation occurred”), (d) (person adversely affected by order issued after hearing
    under subsection (b) of this section may file petition for review in court of appeals of
    United States for circuit in which violation occurred or person resided on date of
    violation; order of Secretary of Labor subject to review under this subsection is not
    subject to judicial review in another civil proceeding); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 516.120(4)
    (five-year statute of limitations for “injury to the person or rights of another, not
    arising on contract”); Larabee v. Eichler, 
    271 S.W.3d 542
    , 546 (Mo. 2008) (elements
    of a fraud claim).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellees’ motion to dismiss the
    appeal is denied as moot.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-2359

Citation Numbers: 367 F. App'x 730

Judges: Colloton, Gruender, Per Curiam, Wollman

Filed Date: 3/16/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023