United States v. Chovontae Farmer ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 22-1032
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Chovontae Martise Farmer
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
    ____________
    Submitted: August 19, 2022
    Filed: August 30, 2022
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Chovontae Farmer received a 228-month prison sentence after he pleaded
    guilty to conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), 846,
    and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c)(1)(A)(i). An Anders brief suggests that the district court1 should have
    granted a mitigating-role reduction and that the overall sentence is substantively
    unreasonable. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967).
    We conclude that the district court did not clearly err when it denied a
    mitigating-role reduction. See United States v. Hunt, 
    840 F.3d 554
    , 557 (8th Cir.
    2016) (per curiam). We also conclude that Farmer received a substantively
    reasonable sentence. See United States v. Callaway, 
    762 F.3d 754
    , 760 (8th Cir.
    2014) (stating that a within-Guidelines sentence is presumed reasonable). The
    record establishes that the district court sufficiently considered the statutory
    sentencing factors, 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a), and did not rely on an improper factor or
    commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Feemster, 
    572 F.3d 455
    , 461–
    62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
    Finally, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that no
    other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 82–83 (1988).
    We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court, deny the motion to file a
    pro se supplemental brief, and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable John A. Jarvey, then Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa, now retired.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1032

Filed Date: 8/30/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/30/2022