James Fudge v. Moses Jackson , 407 F. App'x 66 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 10-2147
    ___________
    James Charles Fudge,                    *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the Eastern
    * District of Arkansas.
    Moses Jackson, Captain,                 *
    East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC;       * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Brenda Parker, Sgt., East Arkansas      *
    Regional Unit, ADC; Willie Jamison, *
    Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit,      *
    ADC; Patrick V. Walton, Problem         *
    Solver, East Arkansas Regional Unit,    *
    ADC; Steven Decoursey, Sgt., East       *
    Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; David *
    Maney, Problem Solver, East Arkansas *
    Regional Unit, ADC,                     *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 23, 2010
    Filed: January 6, 2011
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Inmate James C. Fudge appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment
    to most defendants he named in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action, and the subsequent entry
    of judgment in favor of the remaining defendant following a jury trial. To the extent
    he has properly raised any issues for review, see Meyers v. Starke, 
    420 F.3d 738
    , 743
    (8th Cir. 2005) (to be reviewable, issue must be presented in brief with some
    specificity), we find no basis for overturning the grant of summary judgment to certain
    defendants, see Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 
    559 F.3d 880
    , 884-85 (8th Cir.
    2009) (summary judgment standard of review), and we reject as meritless his indirect
    challenges to the jury verdict. Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we
    modify the dismissal of the excessive-force claim against Patrick V. Walton for failure
    to exhaust administrative remedies to be without prejudice, see Calico Trailer Mfg.
    Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 
    155 F.3d 976
    , 978 (8th Cir. 1998) (“[c]onsistent with
    exhaustion principles,” modifying dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative
    remedies to be without prejudice).
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
    Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
    Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-2147

Citation Numbers: 407 F. App'x 66

Judges: Bowman, Bye, Colloton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/6/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023