Minor McNeil v. United States ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 20-2638
    ___________________________
    Minor Lee McNeil
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    United States of America; Department of Treasury
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
    ____________
    Submitted: February 19, 2021
    Filed: March 2, 2021
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Minor McNeil appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint regarding
    the issuance of a summons to determine his federal income tax liability and the
    1
    The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas.
    garnishing of his wages to pay past-due taxes. He argues that federal taxation of his
    wages is unconstitutional and he is a citizen of a “sovereign” state.
    The district court determined that McNeil had not identified any applicable
    waiver of sovereign immunity or any basis for the court’s jurisdiction over his claims.
    After careful review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by
    the district court. See Hastings v. Wilson, 
    516 F.3d 1055
    , 1058 (8th Cir. 2008)
    (standard of review).
    As to the government’s motion for sanctions, we may award “just damages”
    and single or double costs if we determine that an appeal is frivolous. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1912
    ; Fed. R. App. P. 38. In this case, we conclude that sanctions are appropriate.
    See United States v. Gerads, 
    999 F.2d 1255
    , 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam)
    (rejecting argument that “Free Citizens of the Republic of Minnesota” were not
    subject to taxation; granting government’s motion for sanctions for frivolous appeal).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B,
    and we grant the government’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $8,000. We
    also deny McNeil’s motion for remand.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-2638

Filed Date: 3/2/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2021