Maricruz Zavala v. Monty Wilkinson ( 2021 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-2173
___________________________
Maricruz Zavala
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States1
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 23, 2021
Filed: March 8, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, MELLOY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
1
Monty Wilkinson has been appointed to serve as the Acting Attorney General
of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 43(c).
Maricruz Zavala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding her removable for having committed a crime
involving moral turpitude and denying cancellation of removal. Zavala argues that
her conviction under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B) is not a crime involving moral
turpitude. As the agency noted, in Guardado-Garcia v. Holder, 615 F.3d 900, 902
(8th Cir. 2010), this court held that a conviction under section 408(a)(7)(B) is a crime
involving moral turpitude. Although Zavala argues that decision was wrongly
decided, we are bound by it. See United States v. Pryor, 927 F.3d 1042, 1044-45 (8th
Cir. 2019) (reaffirming that one panel is bound by decisions of earlier panels absent
en banc review, despite party’s argument that earlier decision was wrongly decided);
Mader v. United States, 654 F.3d 794, 800 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (“It is a cardinal
rule in our circuit that one panel is bound by the decision of a prior panel.”).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
______________________________
-2-