Mike Strong v. Caliber Home Loans ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 20-1871
    ___________________________
    Mike K. Strong
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Caliber Home Loans, Inc.; U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master
    Participation Trust; Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
    ____________
    Submitted: March 15, 2021
    Filed: March 24, 2021
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Mike Strong appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his diversity action. He
    argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for breach of contract and
    slander of title under Nebraska law. Upon careful de novo review, see Greenman v.
    Jessen, 
    787 F.3d 882
    , 887 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), we affirm.
    We agree with the district court that Strong’s breach-of-contract claim was
    barred by res judicata under Nebraska law, as the claim accrued at the time of the
    alleged breach, and could have been litigated in his prior diversity action. See C.H.
    Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 
    695 F.3d 758
    , 764 (8th Cir. 2012) (federal
    diversity judgment is given same claim-preclusive effect that state courts would give
    to state court judgment); Weyh v. Gottsch, 
    929 N.W.2d 40
    , 52 (Neb. 2019) (contract
    cause of action accrues at time of breach); Fetherkile v. Fetherkile, 
    907 N.W.2d 275
    ,
    286 (Neb. 2018) (elements of res judicata under Nebraska law; res judicata applies
    to matters which might have been litigated in prior action). Assuming Strong’s
    slander-of-title claim was not barred by res judicata--as the foreclosure sale of part
    of the property at issue was not judicially confirmed until 2019--we agree with the
    district court that Strong failed to state a claim. See Wilson v. Fieldgrove, 
    787 N.W.2d 707
    , 711 (Neb. 2010) (slander of title claim requires false and malicious
    statement, and filing notice of valid claim is not false or malicious).
    The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District
    of Nebraska.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1871

Filed Date: 3/24/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/24/2021