United States v. Eric Littlecalf , 699 F. App'x 624 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         OCT 12 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    16-30196
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No.
    1:14-cr-00130-SPW-1
    v.
    ERIC HARVEY LITTLECALF,                         MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted August 31, 2017**
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and FOOTE,*** District Judge.
    Eric Littlecalf appeals his convictions for assault resulting in serious bodily
    injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6), 1153(a), and 3559(f)(3), and felony
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    ***
    The Honorable Elizabeth E. Foote, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
    child abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153(b) and Montana Code Annotated
    § 45-5-212(1) and (2). The convictions stem from injuries suffered by K.L., his
    eight-month-old son. Littlecalf contends there was insufficient evidence to sustain
    the convictions. We affirm.
    There is sufficient evidence to support a conviction if, after considering the
    evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, “any rational trier of fact
    could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    Jackson v. Virginia, 
    443 U.S. 307
    , 319 (1979).
    Evidence at trial established that K.L. suffered a skull fracture and subdural
    hematoma. The government presented evidence that Littlecalf admitted to striking
    K.L. and that K.L.’s injuries were consistent with Littlecalf’s admission. One of
    K.L.’s treating physicians testified that K.L.’s injuries involved the protracted loss
    or impairment of the function of a body member, organ, or mental faculty, and two
    of K.L.’s treating physicians testified that his injuries involved extreme physical
    pain.
    Accordingly, there was sufficient evidence for a rational jury to convict
    Littlecalf.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-30196

Citation Numbers: 699 F. App'x 624

Filed Date: 10/12/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023