-
FILED JUN 08 2011 NOT FOR PUBLICATION MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN ERIC WALKER, No. 10-15163 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 06-cv-02062-ATG v. MEMORANDUM * D. K. SISTO, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Alfred T. Goodwin, Circuit Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California state prisoner Steven Eric Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2254habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Walker contends that the Board’s 2004 and 2005 decisions to deny him parole were not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. See Swarthout v. Cooke,
131 S. Ct. 859, 863 (2011) (per curiam). Because Walker raises no procedural challenges, we affirm. Walker’s request for additional briefing is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 10-15163
Document Info
Docket Number: 10-15163
Citation Numbers: 436 F. App'x 809
Judges: Paez, Pregerson, Thomas
Filed Date: 6/8/2011
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/3/2023