Clifton Reece v. Correct Care Solutions , 642 F. App'x 293 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-7708
    CLIFTON REECE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, Medical Staff, Doctors; NURSE WISE;
    MAJOR FLIPPIN,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:15-cv-00711-TSE-IDD)
    Submitted:   March 29, 2016                 Decided:   April 1, 2016
    Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Clifton Reece, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Clifton Reece seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    dismissing      without     prejudice        his       42      U.S.C.     § 1983    (2012)
    complaint for failing to comply with a court order.                            This court
    may   exercise    jurisdiction       only       over     final       orders,   28   U.S.C.
    § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
    28    U.S.C.    § 1292    (2012);     Fed.      R.      Civ.    P.    54(b);     Cohen     v.
    Beneficial      Indus.    Loan     Corp.,       
    337 U.S. 541
    ,     545-46     (1949).
    Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be
    remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that
    the order Reece seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                           See Domino Sugar
    Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67
    (4th Cir. 1993).         Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction     and     remand    the    case     to    the     district      court     with
    instructions to allow Reece to file an amended complaint.                                 See
    Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 
    807 F.3d 619
    , 623-24
    (4th Cir. 2015).          We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal     contentions      are     adequately          presented     in    the
    materials      before    this     court   and      argument       would    not     aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED & REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-7708

Citation Numbers: 642 F. App'x 293

Filed Date: 4/1/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023