Karen Jilavdaryan v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 549 F. App'x 634 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           DEC 9 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    KAREN JILAVDARYAN,                               No. 12-71137
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A200-908-550
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted November 19, 2013**
    Before:        CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    Karen Jilavdaryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of
    the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal
    and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for substantial evidence the
    agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 
    590 F.3d 1034
    , 1039 (9th Cir. 2010),
    and we deny the petition for review.
    Jilavdaryan contends he suffered past persecution and has a fear of future
    persecution by “Armenian mobsters” who extorted money from him. Substantial
    evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal. See Zetino v.
    Holder, 
    622 F.3d 1007
    , 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An alien’s desire to be free from
    harassment by criminals motivated by theft . . . bears no nexus to a protected
    ground.”); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 
    555 F.3d 734
    , 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (a
    protected ground must be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant).
    We reject Jilavdaryan’s contention that the BIA failed to address his arguments,
    and also reject his request for a remand.
    Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Jilavdaryan’s CAT
    claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured
    by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in Armenia. See Silaya
    v. Mukasey, 
    524 F.3d 1066
    , 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    12-71137
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-71137

Citation Numbers: 549 F. App'x 634

Judges: Canby, Thomas, Trott

Filed Date: 12/9/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023