Jonathan Birdt v. Charlie Beck , 670 F. App'x 607 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              NOV 09 2016
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JONATHAN BIRDT,                                  No. 12-55115
    Plaintiff-Appellant,               D.C. No. 2:10-cv-08377-JAK-
    JEM
    v.
    CHARLIE BECK; et al.,                            MEMORANDUM*
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted October 25, 2016**
    Before:      LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    Jonathan Birdt appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42
    U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his Second Amendment rights. We
    have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Peruta v. County of
    San Diego, 
    824 F.3d 919
    , 925 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    In Peruta v. San Diego, this court, sitting en banc, held that a member of the
    general public does not have a right under the Second Amendment to carry a
    concealed firearm in public, and that a state may impose restrictions, including a
    showing of good cause, on concealed carry. 
    Id. at 939.
    The San Diego and Yolo
    County Sheriff’s Department policies interpreting the California statutory good
    cause requirement at issue in Peruta therefore survived a Second Amendment
    challenge. See 
    id. For the
    same reasons, the Los Angeles Police Department’s and
    the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s policies interpreting the California
    statutory good cause requirement do not violate the Second Amendment.
    The motions by amici curiae for leave to file amici briefs are granted. The
    Clerk shall file the amici briefs submitted on October 30, 2012 and November 5,
    2012. Appellant’s motion to submit the case without oral argument, filed on
    October 30, 2012, is granted.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                   12-55115
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-55115

Citation Numbers: 670 F. App'x 607

Filed Date: 11/9/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023