Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones v. Ted Scott, M.D. ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                      NO. 07-04-0077-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL D
    DECEMBER 3, 2004
    ______________________________
    DALE SUE JONES AND STANLEY RAY JONES, APPELLANTS
    V.
    TED SCOTT, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
    NO. 2001-513,918; HONORABLE J. BLAIR CHERRY, JR., JUDGE1
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
    NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY
    Appellants Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones perfected this appeal to
    challenge the trial court’s order dismissing their health care liability claim against appellees.
    1
    The district clerk’s certificate reflects that the Honorable Richard Dambold, sitting
    by assignment, presided at trial.
    Both the clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed. On November 19, 2004, the
    Joneses filed a notice of bankruptcy. Attached to the notice is a “Chapter 13 Plan” from the
    United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma bearing a file stamp
    of August 12, 2004. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, an automatic stay is imposed prohibiting
    the commencement or continuation of any judicial actions or proceedings against a debtor.
    Pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is
    suspended.2 For administrative purposes, the appeal is removed from the docket and
    abated. Any documents filed subsequent to the bankruptcy petition will remain pending
    until the appeal is reinstated. The appeal will be reinstated upon proper showing from the
    United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma that the stay has
    been lifted and a request for specific action by this Court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a).
    Accordingly, the appeal is abated.
    Per Curiam
    2
    Although the notice of bankruptcy does not include an authenticated copy of the
    page reflecting the date the petition was filed as required by Rule 8.1(e), pursuant to Rule
    2, we suspend the operation of subsection (3) and abate this appeal.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-04-00077-CV

Filed Date: 12/3/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015